|
In 1822,
shortly after Indianapolis was established, two men were appointed
by the Marion County Commissioners to act as overseers of the poor
and dispense limited amounts of relief. In addition, the city's
leaders personally supplied "outdoor" relief-food, clothing,
and sometimes cash-to those in need. This group of city fathers.
set up the Indianapolis Benevolent Society in 1835 to help the poor.
During
this period, reform movements were sweeping through society. Temperance,
abolition, and women's rights drew the interest of many. Middle
and upper-class women gained entry into the public sphere of life
through voluntary associations. Helping impoverished women and children
was compatible with the. notion that it was a woman's job to nurture
her family and protect it from a cruel and competitive world. This
view, as well as the obvious needs of the poor, led the men involved
in the Indianapolis Benevolent Society to enlist the help of their
wives in forming an organization focused on needy women and children.
.
The future
Children's Bureau of Indianapolis began operations in 1851 as the
Indianapolis Widows and Orphans Friends' Society, a designation
that reflected its main intent. Both women and children were at
risk when the man of the family, the main breadwinner, died, abandoned'
them, or lost his job. Alone, poor women had few means to provide
for their children. In times of depression or economic panic, the
plight of these women became even worse. While widows and children
were the main focus of the Society at first, concern was soon concentrated
on the children, leading the Society to establish an orphanage.
The Indiana General Assembly changed the name of the association
to the Indianapolis Orphans' Asylum in 1875 to reflect this focus.
Through
the years, children stayed in the orphanage for varying lengths
of time. Full orphans could be adopted. Half-orphans, those with
one surviving parent, could not be adopted unless that parent relinquished
to the orphanage his or her rights over the child. The orphanage
often provided children a place of refuge as they waited for their
remaining parent to find the resources to care for them. For some,
that time' never came. These children eventually were bound out
or placed in homes.
In Indianapolis, as elsewhere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries, people wrestled with theories of childhood development
and the causes of poverty. Reformers attempted to differentiate
between the worthyand the unworthy poor. Ideas about the value of
family life and institutional care were evolving. Increasing
|
 |
|
Chubby babies posed at the orphanage in the 1920s.
|
value
was placed on the role that the family, especially the mother, played
in a child's development. Children came tobe valued less for. their
ability to work and more for the love and joy they brought to a
family.
The economic
realities of the 1930s spelled the end of the asylum as an institution.
As the Great Depression settled on the United States, people turned
to public relief when private efforts failed. In 1935 the United
States Congress passed the Aid to Dependent Children provision,
which provided some money for poor women to help them keep their
children at home. This further validated the idea that children
needed to live in a family unit; the time of the orphanage had passed.
After
the orphanage closed in 1941, the mission of the Children's Bureau
expanded. While foster care and adoptive services remained a mainstay,
the Bureau sought other ways to provide safe havens for children
and adolescents, such as group homes and transitional living experiences.
The Bureau aggressively looked for homes for minority youths through
the Homes for Black Children program. Today the Children's Bureau
continues to extend its services as funding has become available
for other program.
For the
Children's Sake focuses on the evolution of an organization. It
also reveals how social circumstances and the ideological underpinnings
of caring for children have changed over the past 150 years. The
story of the Children's Bureau of Indianapolis is a story worth
telling, for it provides perspective on the role of "vulnerable"
children in society. Within the larger context of political change,
it is a story of small successes and sometimes failures: The Children's
Bureau has touched the lives of individuals and influenced its community
in ways both too small to be clearly seen and too large to be accurately
measured.
|